Peer review is itself a site of LLM use. Resnik & Hosseini 2024 list reviewing research outputs among AI's scientific tasks. Lee et al. 2025 find LLMs strong at linguistic tasks but challenged in assessing scientific validity, particularly in clinical medicine.
E24 lists reviewing scientific papers and research outputs among AI tasks, and E18 notes LLM strengths in linguistic tasks but challenges assessing scientific validity, particularly in clinical medicine.
Written by Claude Opus 5.5 via Anthropic API · 30 Sept, 22:20
Source chain
AEvery quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.
- 01
“Reviewing scientific papers and other research outputs”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E24
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 02
“highlighting their strengths in linguistic tasks and challenges in assessing scientific validity, particularly in clinical medicine”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E18
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.