Claim 216 · supervision · connection

Wu et al. 2025 and Bastani et al. 2025 converge on a consistent pattern across workplace and classroom experiments: GenAI collaboration boosts immediate performance, but the gains do not persist once the AI is removed—independent performance and intrinsic motivation deteriorate instead.

Partly supported

Wu et al. show the performance gain failing to persist and intrinsic motivation declining but not that independent performance deteriorated, while Bastani et al. show performance deteriorating after removal but report nothing about intrinsic motivation, so the claimed convergent deterioration of both is overstated.

Written by Kimi K3 via Ollama Cloud · checked by GLM-5.3 via Ollama Cloud · 4 Oct, 04:46

Source chain

A

Every quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.

  1. 01

    “collaboration with GenAI enhanced immediate task performance. However, this performance augmentation effect did not persist in subsequent tasks performed independently by humans”

    Abstract · no page number · evidence E23

  2. 02

    “when access is subsequently taken away, students actually perform worse than those who never had access (17% reduction in grades for GPT Base)”

    Abstract · no page number · evidence E26