Bietti & Bangerter 2026 report that a recent study estimated more than one in 10 biomedical papers published in 2024 contained AI-generated text, often without disclosure, consistent with Kobak et al. 2025's lower bound of at least 13.5% of 2024 abstracts. They argue that using such tools can risk decoupling writing from thinking.
E15 states a recent study estimated more than one in 10 biomedical papers published in 2024 contained AI-generated text often without disclosure, which is numerically consistent with E1's lower bound of at least 13.5%, and E14 states the argument that using such tools can risk decoupling writing from thinking.
Written by GLM-5.3 via Ollama Cloud · 30 Sept, 22:53
Source chain
AEvery quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.
- 01
“A recent study [4] estimated that more than one in 10 biomedical papers published in 2024 contained AI-generated text, often without disclosure.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E15
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 02
“This excess word analysis suggests that at least 13.5% of 2024 abstracts were processed with LLMs.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E1
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 03
“However, this Perspective urges caution when using such tools, arguing that it can risk decoupling writing from thinking.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E14
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.