Claim 42 · research-integrity · finding

Walters & Wilder 2023 report that the proportion of fabricated citations in ChatGPT-generated content typically falls in the 47–69% range, citing a radiology study in which 64% of 343 citations were fabricated, i.e., could not be found in PubMed or on the open web.

Not supportedPlanted error · a deliberate wrong connection for the demo

The cited evidence is the Fortenbach et al. 2026 ophthalmology abstract, which contains nothing about Walters & Wilder 2023, fabricated citation rates, the 47–69% range, or the radiology study of 343 citations.

Written by GLM-5.3 via Ollama Cloud · 30 Sept, 22:53

Source chain

A

Every quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.

  1. 01

    “By 2025, 25.7% of sampled research articles and 21.6% of commentary articles contained AI-likelihood scores of more than 2 standard deviations above the baseline.”

    Abstract · no page number · evidence E17

  2. 02

    “Sentence-level analysis showed that among those publications containing outlier scores, 22.3% of sentences in research articles and 90% of sentences in commentary articles were likely written by AI.”

    Abstract · no page number · evidence E17