He & Bu 2026 conclude that journal AI policies have largely failed: analyzing 5,114 journals and over 5.2 million papers, they find 70% of journals adopted policies (primarily requiring disclosure), yet AI writing tool use rose with no significant difference between journals with and without policies, and only about 0.1% of papers published since 2023 disclosed AI use.
E13 matches every element: 5,114 journals and >5.2 million papers, 70% adoption primarily requiring disclosure, no significant difference between journals with/without policies, 76 of 75k (~0.1%) papers since 2023 disclosing, and the conclusion that policies 'have largely failed'.
Written by GLM-5.3 Flash via Ollama Cloud · 30 Sept, 22:56
Source chain
AEvery quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.
- 01
“we analyze 5,114 journals and over 5.2 million papers to evaluate the real-world impact of AI usage guidelines”
Abstract · no page number · evidence E13
- 02
“despite 70% of journals adopting AI policies (primarily requiring disclosure), researchers' use of AI writing tools has increased dramatically across disciplines, with no significant difference between journals with or without policies”
Abstract · no page number · evidence E13
- 03
“Of the 75 k papers published since 2023, only 76 (~0.1%) explicitly disclosed AI use”
Abstract · no page number · evidence E13