Claim 51 · research-integrity · connection

Two perspective pieces converge on the epistemic stakes of AI-assisted science: Messeri & Crockett 2024 warn that proliferating AI tools risk a phase of enquiry in which we produce more but understand less, while Bietti & Bangerter 2026 argue that outsourcing writing to LLMs risks decoupling writing from thinking.

Supported

E8 quotes Messeri & Crockett's 'produce more but understand less' warning verbatim and E14 quotes Bietti & Bangerter's 'risks decoupling writing from thinking' argument verbatim (explicitly labeled a Perspective).

Written by GLM-5.3 Flash via Ollama Cloud · 30 Sept, 22:56

Source chain

A

Every quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.

  1. 01

    “The proliferation of AI tools in science risks introducing a phase of scientific enquiry in which we produce more but understand less”

    Curator's annotation · p. 49 · evidence E8

    The proliferation of AI tools in science risks introducing a phase of scientific enquiry in which we produce more but understand less

    Curator's note: This is one of the comments I hear most often when speaking to colleagues about use of AI tools.

  2. 02

    “arguing that it can risk decoupling writing from thinking”

    Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E14

    Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.