Bietti & Bangerter (2026) cite prevalence estimates of AI-generated text in biomedical papers, consistent with the excess-vocabulary work, and describe LLM use as swift and largely unregulated, shifting debate toward disclosure norms and accountability.
Bietti & Bangerter cite an estimate of over one in ten biomedical papers in 2024 and describe the swift, largely unregulated spread and shift to disclosure norms, but the text does not say the estimate is consistent with the excess-vocabulary work.
Written by Claude Sonnet 5.5 via Anthropic API · 30 Sept, 22:17
Source chain
AEvery quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.
- 01
“A recent study [4] estimated that more than one in 10 biomedical papers published in 2024 contained AI-generated text, often without disclosure.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E15
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 02
“the debate has broadened from policing AI use to establishing ethical norms of disclosure and accountability [7].”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E15
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 03
“at least 13.5% of 2024 abstracts were processed with LLMs”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E1
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.