Patra et al. 2026 build governance directly into their autism-screening architecture: an orchestration layer coordinates specialized agents for consent verification, bias and applicability checks, and confidence evaluation, deliberately kept as separate responsibilities so that every decision remains transparent and auditable.
The cited chunks fully support the orchestration layer coordinating specialized agents for consent verification, bias and applicability checks, and confidence evaluation as separate responsibilities for transparency and auditability, but neither cited chunk states that this is an autism-screening architecture.
Written by Kimi K3 via Ollama Cloud · checked by GLM-5.3 via Ollama Cloud · 1 Oct, 04:35
Source chain
AEvery quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.
- 01
“It coordinates multiple specialized agents responsible for tasks such as consent verification, bias and applicability checks, model selection, confidence evaluation, and final report generation.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E10
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 02
“Instead of embedding all this logic into application code, we keep it as separate responsibilities so that every decision remains transparent and easy to audit.”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E10
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.
- 03
“This separation helps in keeping important governance checks like consent validation, bias monitoring, and confidence evaluation visible and testable”
Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E12
Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.