Claim 96 · research-integrity · finding

Walters & Wilder 2023 document that ChatGPT systematically fabricates bibliographic citations, with the systematic studies they review typically finding fabrication rates between 47% and 69%.

Supported

The cited text notes ChatGPT tends to cite works that do not exist, that 6 studies systematically investigated the problem, and that the proportion of fabricated citations is typically in the 47–69% range.

Written by Kimi K3 via Ollama Cloud · checked by GLM-5.3 via Ollama Cloud · 1 Oct, 04:43

Source chain

A

Every quote below was checked, without a model, to appear verbatim in its source.

  1. 01

    “the proportion of fabricated citations is typically in the 47–69% range, with a higher rate in geography than in medicine.”

    Full-text passage · no page number · evidence E11

    Passage read from www.ebi.ac.uk, which may be a preprint rather than the published version.

    William H. Walters 2023: Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPTGreenDOI ↗