The rise of agentic AI in drug discovery from static tools to autonomous virtual scientists
Donghai Zhao, Meijing Fang, Lexiao Mao, Yuchen Zhu, Qun Su, Hui Shi, Hongxia Xu, Lanqing Li and 2 more
Why it has this license class
AChecked 15 Oct 2026. Non-commercial or no-derivatives license: full text kept internally; only metadata and abstract are indexed and used.
| Source | License | Open-access status | Read as |
|---|---|---|---|
| openalex | cc-by-nc-nd | gold | Yellow |
| crossref | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 | — | Yellow |
| unpaywall | cc-by-nc-nd | gold | Yellow |
Abstract
BDriven by large language models, AI agents are transforming drug discovery, enabling AI to break free from task-specific tools and advance toward the vision of autonomous virtual scientists. This perspective reviews applications across the R&D lifecycle. To evaluate system maturity, we introduce a 6-level "Spectrum of Agentic Autonomy." We advocate for novel evaluation paradigms centered on full-chain traceability and outline adoption barriers, positioning AI agents as pragmatic scientist-in-the-loop co-pilots.
Claims built on this paper
D- Multiple 2026 perspectives are converging on staged autonomy taxonomies as the way to measure agentic-science maturity: Zhao et al. 2026 introduce a 6-level "Spectrum of Agentic Autonomy" for drug discovery, while Hebenstreit et al. 2026 synthesize four prior frameworks into a biomedical framework distinguishing cognitive from physical capabilities. Trace →
- Within drug discovery, developers stake out opposed autonomy positions for similar lifecycles: Ghareeb et al. 2026 describe Robin as the first system to fully automate hypothesis generation and data analysis, whereas Huynh et al. 2026 build RepurAgent explicitly around a human-in-the-loop design and Zhao et al. 2026 position agents as pragmatic scientist-in-the-loop co-pilots. Trace →
- Three independent 2026 efforts converge on 'scientist-in-the-loop' as the pragmatic deployment form for research agents: Jeon 2026 prescribes strict boundaries in plant pathology under which a human sets goals, reviews AI output before it is treated as evidence, and approves consequential actions; Zhao et al. 2026 advocate 'pragmatic scientist-in-the-loop co-pilots' for drug discovery; and Huynh et al. 2026 built the drug-repurposing system RepurAgent around a human-in-the-loop design. Trace →
- The levels-of-autonomy schema familiar from engineering standards is being imported into AI-for-science governance by two independent 2026 papers: Zhao et al. 2026 introduce a 6-level 'Spectrum of Agentic Autonomy' for drug discovery, and Hebenstreit et al. 2026 synthesize AGI and engineering-autonomy frameworks into a biomedical framework distinguishing cognitive from physical capabilities. Trace →
- The full-chain traceability that Zhao et al. 2026 demand as a new evaluation paradigm is already being practiced: Yoon et al. 2026 used session transcripts to attribute their agent's discovery to the model directly examining DNA sequences and recognizing atypical repeats, a behavior they trace to specific internal signals responding to repeated DNA. Trace →